Wikipedia Quotations

Wikipedia

Wikipedia is a Web-based, freely editable encyclopedia by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation.

Early years: 2001–2010

• However closely a Wikipedia article may at some point in its life attain to reliability, it is forever open to the uninformed or semiliterate meddler.
  • Critique given by former Encyclopædia Britannica editor Robert McHenry in a frequently cited 2004 piece The Faith-Based Encyclopedia

• Wikipedia's promise is nothing less than the liberation of human knowledge - both by incorporating all of it through the collaborative process, and by freely sharing it with everybody who has access to the internet. This is a radically popular idea.
  • The Economist, 20 April 2006

• Shoppin' online for deals on some writable media. I edit Wikipedia.
  • "Weird Al" Yankovic, "White & Nerdy", Straight Outta Lynwood (2006)

• When I visited the offices [in St. Petersburg, Florida] in March, the walls were bare, the furniture battered. With the addition of a dead plant, the suite could pass for a graduate-student lounge.
  • Stacy Schiff, 2006-07-31, Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?, The New Yorker

• Hofstadter: The entry is filled with inaccuracies, and it kind of depresses me. Solomon: So fix it. Hofstadter: The next day someone will fix it back.
  • On "Douglas Hofstadter" article; Deborah Solomon, "The Mind Reader," New York Times, (2007-04-01)

• Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject, so you know you are getting the best possible information.
  • Michael Scott (played by Steve Carell), The Office, "The Negotiation" [3.18], 5 April 2007

• You just can't put something with commercial motive into Wikipedia. Admitting it is hardly better; it is still a crime. The Wikipedians and bloggers will attack hard and they will deserve what they get.
  • On an attempt to promote a marketing slogan by creating a Wikipedia article for it
  • Jeff Jarvis (June 23, 2007). "Buying their voices". BuzzMachine. HostingMatters. Retrieved on 2007-06-29.

• You set up this fantastic site, with people sending information all around the world, and you don't make any money of it! It's practically an un-American activity!
  • Clive Anderson, 2007-07-24, The Wikipedia Story, BBC Radio 4

• The Tsunami article is well researched and extensive, only at two places a little inaccurate. The scientific Wikipedia articles are, according to my judgement, almost always good.
  • de:Frank Schätzing, SF author, quoted in Stern, December 2007
• The article [Martin Luther] is ample and solidly written. Someone was really occupied with Luther and read some church histories. I give extra points for quoting from sources and the pictures.
  • de:Margot Käßmann, Lutheran bishop, quoted in Stern, December 2007
• There is nothing to add to that entry [Marinade]. In my view it contains all important information. I use Wikipedia often for food chemistry. Sometimes you find something you didn't even think about.
  • de:Sarah Wiener, TV cook, quoted in Stern, December 2007

• "I think there’s more information about culture in Wikipedia than anywhere else in the world, ever."
  • w:Tyler Cowen "Why everything has changed: the recent revolution in cultural economics" in Journal of Cultural Economics (2008), 32, p. 266, Doi|10.1007/s10824-008-9074-y

• It seems that Wikipedia.com, that splendid source for all kinds of information, is no longer dedicated to the truth, assuming it ever was. Individuals who have tried to edit the pages about Barack Obama — to reflect the incontrovertible fact that he is not God, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, or Ronald Reagan — report that their contributions have vanished within minutes of posting them, and that they, themselves, have been suspended for three days following each 'infraction'. When some sort of official at Wikipedia was contacted about this, she stonewalled, claiming that this censorship was the work of 'volunteers', implying they were somehow beyond control of Wikipedia itself. Like the Red Guard and the Khmer Rouge were 'volunteers'.
  • L. Neil Smith, "Announcifications From Your Publicatorialist: Wikipedia, Missouri, and Ceres", 15 March 2009

• Even the founders of Wikipedia had no clue when they started the project of what it would accomplish. They dug a hole to find water, and struck oil instead.
  • Erik Zachte (Wikimedia Foundation data analyst), "Numbers and Strategy", July 24th, 2009.

• We now see the strong emergence of the Social Web instead of the Semantic Web, and a proposal has been made to use Wikipedia, the largest hierarchical collection of information in the world, as bottom-up input for the ontologies required to give shape to the Semantic Web.
  • Jaap Bloem, Menno van Doorn, Sander Duivestein, Me the media: rise of the conversation society, Ed. VINT printed by Bariet, The Netherlands, 2009, ISBN 978 90 75414 22 6, p.277.

• Wikipedia is effectively one-of-a-kind. No other mass-market or topically broad wikis have had meaningful success to date. Even Wikimedia's other wiki projects are not nearly as active as Wikipedia. If successful wikis are rare, Wikipedia might be a one-in-a-million lightning strike — some unique combination of factors succeeded in this case, but those circumstances are unlikely to replicate. If so, Wikipedia's rarity might also highlight its fragility.
  • Goldman, Eric, Wikipedia's Labor Squeeze and its Consequences, 8, Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law

• When I write, I consult Wikipedia 30–40 times a day, because it is really helpful. When I write, I don't remember if someone was born in the 6th century or the 7th; or maybe how many n's are in "Goldmann"... Just a few years ago, for this kind of thing you could waste a lot of time.
  • Umberto Eco, interview 24 April 2010 by Wikinotizie:Wiki@Home, Wikimedia Italia

• Wikipedia is, for many users, the primary site for information on the Web (...) At present, Wikipedia hosts more than 2.9 million English-language articles, with a total of 13 million articles available in more than 250 different languages (...) Wikipedia is the second-most searched site on the Internet, behind only Google.
  • Michael Miller, Sams Teach Yourself Wikipedia in 10 Minutes, Pearson Education, inc., 2010, ISBN 978-0-672-33123-7, pages 3 & 5.

• As Wikipedia founder Jim Wales revealed, back in 2005, 50 percent of all Wikipedia edits were made by just 0.7 percent of users; 75 percent of all articles were written by less than 2 percent of the user base. These numbers reveal that the active Wikipedia community is a lot smaller than you might think. It's understandable, then, for this active group to be somewhat self-centered, and not always accommodating to new or causual users.
  • Michael Miller, Sams Teach Yourself Wikipedia in 10 Minutes, Pearson Education, inc., 2010, ISBN 978-0-672-33123-7, page 163.

Tenth anniversary: 15 January 2011

• America's daily political vitriol is an undeniable fact. Against that depressing background, it is good to be able to celebrate an American invention which, for all its faults, tries to spread around the world a combination of unpaid idealism, knowledge and stubborn civility.
  • Timothy Garton Ash, "We've seen America's vitriol. Now let's salute Wikipedia, a US pioneer of global civility," The Guardian, 12 January 2011; and "Look it up: Wikipedia is turning 10," The Los Angeles Times, 14 January 2011
• It can be stunningly good on obscure corners of popular culture, and strikingly weak on mainstream matters.
  • Timothy Garton Ash, "We've seen America's vitriol. Now let's salute Wikipedia, a US pioneer of global civility"

• The kind of social production that Wikipedia represents has turned from a laughable utopia to a practical reality. That's the biggest gift that Wikipedia has given to us – a vision of practical utopia that allows us to harness the more sociable, human aspects of who we are to effective collective action.
  • Yochai Benkler, "All-Star Thinkers on Wikipedia's 10th Anniversary", The Atlantic, 13 January 2011

• Wikipedia underscores an evolutionary lesson: We've always gotten farther as a species collaborating than going it alone. [...] In the past, the groups that cooperated best lived longer and had more kids – and we inherited those tendencies. Groups would correct cheaters (people who didn't share info or goods) through social pressure. So Wikipedia is like humanity's social nature writ large electronically, complete with ongoing disputes and corrections.
  • Mariette DiChristina, "All-Star Thinkers on Wikipedia's 10th Anniversary", The Atlantic, 13 January 2011

• The generation of an infinite number of bogusly 'objective' sentences in an English of agonizing patchwork mediocrity is no cause for celebration, even if it eventually amounts to a Borgesian paraphrase of our entire universe. [...] I liked the internet better before. The mistakes had flavor, passion, transparent purpose.
  • Jonathan Lethem, "All-Star Thinkers on Wikipedia's 10th Anniversary", The Atlantic, 13 January 2011

• The fundamental flaw in the way Wikipedians think about what they do is that they are entirely absorbed in rules and procedures and arguing fine points with one another and earning merit points; it has all the flavour, as has been suggested before, of a great online game. Users -- the ostensible audience – are hardly considered.
  • Robert McHenry, "Viewpoints: what the world thinks of Wikipedia," Wired.co.uk, 13 January 2011

• An authority isn't a person or institution who is always right – ain't no such animal. An authority is a person or institution who has a process for lowering the likelihood that they are wrong to acceptably low levels. [...] And this is what I think is really worth celebrating as Wikipedia begins its second decade. It took one of the best ideas of the last 500 years – peer review – and expanded its field of operation so dramatically that it changed the way authority is configured.
  • Clay Shirky, "All-Star Thinkers on Wikipedia's 10th Anniversary", The Atlantic, 13 January 2011

• Every single day for the last 10 years Wikipedia has got better because someone – several million someones in all – decided to make it better. [...] Wikipedia is best understood not as a product with an organisation behind it, but as an activity that happens to leave an encyclopedia in its wake.
  • Clay Shirky, "Wikipedia – an unplanned miracle," The Guardian, 14 February 2011

• Warm, kindly, humane Wikipedia didn't grow up in today's Internet. Now it's like a hothouse orchid the size of a barn.
  • Bruce Sterling, "All-Star Thinkers on Wikipedia's 10th Anniversary", The Atlantic, 13 January 2011

Contemporary: 2011–

• Watching pornography [..] is like going to a Wikipedia page. You search for a specific thing, a specific feeling, a specific result, and that’s exactly what you find.
  • Meg Wolitzer, "The Sex Drive, Idling in Neutral", New York Times, April 15, 2011.

External links

• Wikipedia multi-lingual portal

Related 'Wikipedia' Searches: